Hyperliquid Gasless Trading – Deep Comparison, Fees, and 20 Optimized Strategies
TL;DR Hyperliquid runs its own Layer-1 with two execution domains:
- HyperCore — native on-chain central limit order book (CLOB), margin, funding, liquidations.
- HyperEVM — standard EVM runtime (gas metered, paid in HYPE).
Trading on HyperCore is gasless: orders, cancels, TP/SL, TWAP, Scale ladders, etc. are signed actions included in consensus, not EVM transactions.
- You don’t need HYPE to place/cancel orders.
- You pay maker/taker fees and funding, not gas.
- Spam is mitigated with address budgets, rate limits, open-order caps.
- If you need more throughput: buy request weight at $0.0005 per action.
The design enables CEX-style strategies (dense ladders, queue dancing, rebates, hourly hedging) without the friction of gas.
Official GitHub repos:
- Python SDK → https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-python-sdk
- Rust SDK → https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-rust-sdk
- Node → https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/node
- Order Book Server (example) → https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/order_book_server
1. How “gasless” works
Order lifecycle
Wallet signs payload → Exchange endpoint → Node → Validators (HyperBFT)
↘ deterministic inclusion into HyperCore state
-
Signatures, not transactions. Your wallet signs payloads (EIP-712 style). These are posted to the Exchange endpoint, gossiped to validators, ordered in consensus, and applied to HyperCore. → No gas, just signature.
-
Onboarding. Enable trading = sign once. Withdrawals = flat $1 fee, not a gas auction. Docs → Onboarding
-
Spam protection.
- Address budgets: 10k starter buffer, then 1 action per 1 USDC lifetime fills.
- Open-order cap: base 1,000 → scales to 5,000.
- Congestion fairness: max 2× maker-share per block.
- ReserveRequestWeight: buy capacity at $0.0005/action. Docs → Rate limits
-
Safety rails.
- scheduleCancel (dead-man’s switch)
- expiresAfter (time-box an action)
- noop (nonce invalidation)
-
Order types. Market, Limit, ALO (post-only), IOC, GTC, TWAP, Scale, TP/SL (market or limit), OCO. Docs → Order types
-
Self-trade prevention. Expire-maker: cancels resting maker side instead of self-fill. Docs → STP
2. Fees: Hyperliquid vs DEXes & CEXes
Perps (base tiers)
Venue | Maker | Taker | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Hyperliquid | 0.015% | 0.045% | Gasless actions; staking discounts up to 40%; rebates up to –0.003% |
dYdX v4 | 0.01% | 0.05% | Gasless submits/cancels; fills only |
GMX v2 (perps) | 0.04–0.06% | 0.04–0.06% | Round-trip 0.08–0.12% + funding/borrow + L2 gas |
Binance Futures | ~0.018% | ~0.045% | VIP/BNB discounts; USDC-M can hit 0% maker |
Bybit Perps | 0.020% | 0.055% | Tiered; VIP reductions |
OKX Futures | 0.020% | 0.050% | VIP can reach –0.005% / 0.015% |
Kraken Futures | 0.020% | 0.050% | Down to 0% / 0.01% at scale |
Spot
Venue | Maker | Taker | Gas |
---|---|---|---|
Hyperliquid | 0.040% | 0.070% | Gasless actions; $1 withdraw |
Uniswap v3 | 0.01–1% | 0.01–1% | User pays gas; or solver embeds in price |
Bybit Spot | 0.15% | 0.10–0.20% | CEX; no gas |
OKX Spot | 0.08% | 0.10% | VIP/OKB discounts |
3. Funding models
- Hyperliquid: 8h rate paid hourly (1/8 each hour). Hyperps use EMA mark (oracle-light).
- dYdX v4: hourly funding; standard premium/interest.
- GMX v2: continuous borrow vs pool imbalance.
4. What gasless enables (tactically)
- Dense ladders + queue dancing: cheap to modify/cancel 1000s of levels.
- Granular hedging: rebalance perps/spot hedges hourly without friction.
- CEX-style STP + ALO: protect queue priority.
- Deterministic inclusion: HyperBFT ensures one global order sequence.
- Predictable scaling: buy request weight explicitly instead of gas auction.
5. Ten core strategies
-
Passive Maker Ladder (ALO + STP) Build dense post-only ladders, earn spread + rebates, cancel/repost gas-free.
-
Rebate Farming (maker-share) Hit ≥0.5%, 1.5%, 3% maker volume shares to unlock –0.001%/–0.002%/–0.003%.
-
Funding-Arb / Cash-and-Carry Long spot vs short perp; rebalance hourly gas-free.
-
TWAP Execution Use native 30s slice TWAP with slippage caps; gasless param tweaks.
-
Scale Order Grids Deploy wide grids with up to 5k resting orders; adjust spacing by ATR.
-
Latency-Aware MM Run node, use
noop
for stale nonces. -
OCO Risk-Boxing (TP/SL) Parent-linked stops/targets; frequent adjustment gasless.
-
Hyperps Momentum/Fade Trade EMA-based hyperps; funding skew stabilizes. Turnkey repo
-
Dead-Man’s Switch Hygiene Always use
scheduleCancel
; pair withexpiresAfter
. -
Throughput Budgeting Add logic to purchase
reserveRequestWeight
at spikes.
6. Ten advanced strategies
-
Maker-Skewed Basis Harvest Hedge legs passively, collect rebates + funding.
-
Adaptive Spread Ladder Contract/expand quotes with realized vol; keep order count fixed.
-
Queue-Position Arbitrage Gasless
modify
to overtake by 1 tick; requires local queue estimation. -
Stale-Quote Punisher Flip passive→taker when off-chain anchors are stale.
-
Rebate-Neutral Market Impact Hedger Pre-compute edge ≈ (S/2 − A − f_m); trade only when ≥0.
-
Funding Skew Swing-Trader Switch between mean-revert & trend based on funding drift.
-
Dead-Man Sessioner Each session starts with
scheduleCancel(t)
to avoid zombie orders. -
Liquidity Layer Splitter Spread ladders across accounts; use STP to avoid self-trades.
-
Cross-Venue Micro-Arb HL vs CEX/DEX; taker on mispriced side, maker on the other.
-
Event-Mode Capacity Burst Pre-buy request weight pre-CPI/FOMC; change ladder parameters.
7. Cost sanity check ($100k notional)
- Hyperliquid: 0.015% maker ($15) + 0.045% taker ($45) = $60 (+ funding).
- dYdX v4: 0.01% + 0.05% = $60.
- GMX v2: 0.04–0.06% open + 0.04–0.06% close = $80–120 (+ borrow + gas).
- Binance Futures: 0.018% + 0.045% ≈ $63 (base VIP).
8. Implementation gotchas
- Budgets & caps: track in code; cancels have higher allowance; throttling needed.
- Min sizes: perps $10 notional; spot 10 quote units.
- ExpiresAfter: avoid triggering (5× budget cost).
- Node ops: run Linux, open ports 4001/4002, colocate in Tokyo.
- Nonces: prefer
modify
; usenoop
if stuck.
9. Comparison snapshot
- Hyperliquid & dYdX v4 — gasless trading actions, on-chain CLOB, deterministic finality.
- UniswapX / CoW — user-gasless via solver; solver pays gas, embeds in your price.
- Uniswap v3/v4, GMX — user pays gas + pool fee; MEV & slippage dominate costs.
- CEXes — no gas, lowest fees at VIP, fiat rails; but centralized custody.
10. GitHub Index
- Org: https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex
- Python SDK: https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-python-sdk
- Rust SDK: https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-rust-sdk
- Node: https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/node
- Order-book server: https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/order_book_server
- TypeScript SDKs: https://github.com/nktkas/hyperliquid, https://github.com/nomeida/hyperliquid
- Go SDK: https://github.com/sonirico/go-hyperliquid
- .NET client: https://github.com/JKorf/HyperLiquid.Net
- Turnkey TS fork: https://github.com/elkadro/hyperliquid-turnkey
- MCP servers: https://github.com/kukapay/hyperliquid-info-mcp, https://github.com/mektigboy/server-hyperliquid
- Stats starter: https://github.com/thunderhead-labs/hyperliquid-stats
Bottom Line
Hyperliquid takes gas out of the trading loop, letting traders focus on fees, funding, latency, and inventory control. The result: a CEX-like experience with on-chain transparency.
Best use cases:
- High-frequency maker strategies (queue-dancing, rebates).
- Funding arbitrage with fine-grained rebalancing.
- Event-driven hedging.
- Developers who want to build bots in Python/Rust/TS/Go without juggling gas balances.